The Center for Retirement Initiatives (CRI) at Georgetown University engaged ESI to assist the Center in developing an analysis of national options to expand retirement savings coverage. The CRI study examines how characteristics such as account type (payroll deduction IRA vs. 401(k)), the employers required to participate, and default levels of employee contributions and any employer contributions will drive access, savings, asset growth, and retirement income over time. The approaches analyzed would result in significant expansions of access and participation among the estimated 57.3 million private sector employees who are not offered any workplace retirement plan today.
Modeling was undertaken on several policy scenarios, selected based on the range of state programs and national proposals, to under their impacts on retirement savings participation, savings, and government expenditures and revenues. Regardless of the model selected, the study concludes that the benefits to savers, retirees, and the nation’s fiscal and economic well-being can be enormous.
Depending on the design features, a national approach to universal access to retirement savings which would require some or all employers to offer their workers either an IRA or 401(k) could:
This report draws from the experience of other countries and from the early state-facilitated retirement programs in the U.S. to make the case that universal access to retirement savings options can be achieved in a simple, cost-effective manner with private market providers ready to compete to offer options for workers.
Nationwide employer mandate could dramatically boost retirement savings
Employee Benefit News
December 21, 2020
US urged to adopt auto-enrollment to address pensions crisis
December 19, 2020
Study: National Access Policy Would Slash Savings Gap
Pensions & Investments,
December 15, 2020
Will ‘National Universal Access’ to 401k plans Increase Coverage?
December 15, 2020